A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was approved and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only wanting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Specific Space of Conservation and say that every one operates have been carried out determined by professional tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming much more contentious.
The Irish Instances report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 through midsection-large water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances and René Collier waded through waistline-higher h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who should Are living together with each other long once the legal costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.